Metadata infrastructure for biomedical research

The missing context in public RNA-seq.

reOmics is developing auditable metadata for human RNA-seq. The first milestone is a validated cohort table, designed to support future search and targeted expression and splicing evidence for drug-development research.

NOW / STAGE 1Metadata curation in development
THE BOTTLENECKPublic data, fragmented descriptions
FIRST DELIVERABLEAuditable human cohort tables
LONGER-TERM PRODUCTQueryable and targeted evidence
01 / THE CHALLENGE

A vast archive.
An incomplete index.

Sequencing files are abundant. The details that make them useful can be scattered across records, buried in free text, or absent altogether.

Before researchers can compare samples, they need to know which tissue, disease, subject, treatment, and experiment each sample represents.

See the data challenge
ONE SAMPLE / MULTIPLE SOURCESILLUSTRATIVE VIEW
01
SRARun and assay
A technical record
02
BioSampleSample attributes
Fragments of biology
03
GEOStudy description
A piece of the cohort
THE MISSING CONNECTIONWhat does this sample actually represent?
02 / THE APPROACH

Make the data
mean something.

reOmics starts with auditable metadata curation. Search and prioritized processing are planned stages built on that foundation.

01

Gather the context

Connect run, sample, study, and publication records across public sources.

02

Make it legible

Extract and normalize tissue, disease, assay, and cohort descriptors with a reviewable evidence trail.

03

Ask better questions

Use curated cohorts to guide search and prioritize deeper expression and splicing analysis.

STAGED PLATFORM ROADMAPMetadata → discovery → deeper evidence
03 / THE FOUNDATION

A label is only useful when you can trace it.

reOmics aims to turn fragmented descriptions into structured fields, with source links, confidence, and review status attached to the record.

How the platform is planned
PROPOSED METADATA SCHEMAFIELD GROUPS / 04
01

Biological context

Tissue · disease · cell type · phenotype

02

Subject & cohort

Donor · case/control · treatment · timepoint

03

Experiment

Assay · layout · run · sample · study

04

Evidence trail

Publication · provenance · review status · confidence

Every field should have a path back to its source.
04 / SCIENTIFIC LINEAGE

Experience at scale.
A new focus on context.

Members of the reOmics team contributed to the recount ecosystem. Its published work shows the scale of the processing foundation; reOmics is a separate, developing effort.

316K+human SRA runs in recount3
763K+human and mouse runs processed
990 TBcompressed reads processed

Historical recount3 figures, not reOmics platform totals. Wilks et al., Genome Biology (2021) ↗

06 / PRODUCT PATH

An open foundation.
Focused research products.

The pitch deck outlines a staged model: make metadata useful and correctable, then develop query access and partner-specific evidence around selected cohorts. These are planned offerings.

01 / PLANNED

Open metadata

Publish curated tables, schemas, and correction workflows to make cohort definitions easier to inspect and improve.

02 / PLANNED

Queryable cohorts

Develop access to disease, tissue, and assay cohorts with provenance and confidence for research teams.

03 / PLANNED

Targeted evidence

Prioritize processing and partner-specific expression or splicing evidence around defined research questions.

Work with reOmics

What could better context reveal for your research?

We welcome conversations about public RNA-seq cohorts, transcriptomic evidence, and research partnerships.

Start a conversation